ANALYSIS COMPARATIVE OF ISLAMIC BANKING HEALTH LEVELS IN ASIA USING RGEC METHOD

Ahmad Mada Wijaya, Guntur Kusuma Wardana

Abstract


This research aims to compare the health levels of Sharia banks in Asia over the period 2017-2022 using the RGEC method, considering the factors of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital. Financial ratios used to assess bank health include risk profile using 2 ratios namely NPF and FDR, GCG factor using self-assessment, Earnings using 4 ratios namely ROA, ROE, BOPO, and capital factors including the CAR ratio. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. The data obtained are secondary data in the form of annual financial reports of the companies. The research results show significant differences in the health of Sharia banks in Asia measured using the RGEC method. Sharia Banks categorized as "Very Healthy" are Al Rajhi Bank, Dubai Islamic Bank, Qatar Islamic Bank, Maybank Islamic Berhad, and Ziraat Katilim Bankansi. While Sharia banks categorized as "Healthy" are Boubyan Islamic Bank, Bank Pasargad Iran, Al Salam Islamic Bank, and Islamic Bank Limited. Then the Sharia banking categorized as "Fairly Healthy" is Bank Muamalat Indonesia.


Keywords


RGEC, bank health, Islamic Banking In Asia

Full Text:

pdf


DOI: https://doi.org/10.32507/ajei.v1i1.2765

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Al-Infaq: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam

 Indexed by:

Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

  

 

License

© Copyright CC BY-SA

web analytics View My Stats

Al-Infaq: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, p-ISSN: 2087-2178, e-ISSN: 2579-6453